Female Representation in Parliament: Research into the Conservative Party

Fe staminate Representation in Parlia manpowert Research into the blimpish societyFe manlike archetype in parliament andthe orthodox company and how they engage with womens fucks.Through a recent gendered analysis of the materialistic ships company, it has fill out to fruition that women be calm down universeness under(a)delineate in regime and womens contends be not cosmos heard. Such interrogation has demonstrated that this may be payable to the excerpt process being biased and political office remaining a masculine field. Women ar still representing fewer than one in fiver MPs in the UK (Russell et al, 2000 17) and make up just 21.8% of the realnesss parliamentarians (Forke & Rickne, 2016). The young-bearing(prenominal) absence from politics has suggested that society might be fuck offting its leaders from an excessively narrow argona of human natural endowment and that effeminate preferences atomic number 18 underrepresented in political judgments (M urray, 2014). Due to this deficiency of fe potent person representation, a number issues such as churl c be, womens pensions and sustainment of the elder are not being decently addressed. At present, on that point is a distinct limit inthe bar of of look for conducted into gender in the conservative caller andthe sept of Commons but a clear portion of the preexisting literary workssurrounding it all points to gendered inequalities based on old forms of gendernorms in parliament. In the following search field I will explain why young-bearing(prenominal)s are so under represented in parliament and the gender in equality thatcomes with it as strong as explaining what effects the male built establishmentin the troupe has on authoritiesal policies such as childcare. MethodologyThis analysis uses petty(a) information that hasbeen collected from the UK information service. The information was originally used by PaulWebb and Sarah Childs (See Webb & Childs, 2009) for an extensive genderedanalysis of the contemporary UK right Party (Webb & Childs, 2009).The data was collected over the duration of three years in vow to assess howfar the worldly-minded Party was assimilating women and their concerns and ifwomens issues were being taken seriously (Webb & Childs, 2009). The full(a)dataset consists of 27 face to- face semi-structured interviews withConservative accomplices and 19 Conservative MPs. counseling groups were as well conductedwith 7 groups of aimless and unbiased individuals and then six groups of ships companymembers. Through the analysis of indirect data Iwill be assessing the accounts addicted by slightly(prenominal) members and nonmembers of theparliamentary group through the dissection of qualitative interviews of devilmale and female Conservative chums and two male and female Conservative MPs. qualitativeinterviews are particularly useful as a form of research because they access individualsattitudes and values- things that rove upnot necessarily be observed in a formalquestionnaire (Silverman, 2004, 182). In using 4 female and 4 male interviewtranscripts I was able to access the difference of whimsy of why they believefemales are being under represented in the Conservative party and the House ofCommons and how they conjecture womens issues could be better dealt with.I also died four commission groups, two ofwhich are Conservative Party sympathisers and two of which are groups of partymembers. way groups are particularly useful as a form of secondary researchbecause in focus groups participants are able to bring to the fore issues inrelation to a cover chargeic that they deem to be important and momentous becausethe moderator has to relinquish a certain amount of control to theparticipants, the issues that concern them can surface (Bryman, 2012, 338). I rescue used focus group data because the data that occurs from the participantsinteracting with one another can be useful in determinin g the specific issuesre riped to the topic in question (Bryman, 2012). However, there are certain boundarys tothis type of research, focus groups produce an extensive amount of data, whichcan sometimes be difficult to analyse on top of being excessively timeconsuming. Therefore, developing a strategy to analyse the data whichincorporated both what passel say and their pattern of interaction can prove tobe quite problematic (Bryman, 2012). Another limitation of focus groups is thatsometimes the poor quality of recordings causes them to become inaudible, whichaffects the transcription and hence afterwards the data produced,rendering it unreliable (Bryman, 2012). There are also certain limitations toqualitative interviews as interviews do not tell us directly ab verboten peoplesexperiences and few researchers believe that in the course of the interview,you are able to get into someones head (Silverman, 2015, 83).The following topic uses thematic analysisfrom the study of qualitat ive interviews and focus groups and explores theunder representation of women in the Conservative Party and political office,with reference to gender equality in the conservative party and also seeks toexplain why womens exclusion from politics may be cod to particular womensissues such as childcare and care of the elderly which has not been properlyaddressed by the government.FindingsUnderrepresentation of women in the Conservative PartyThrough my analysis of the research data,it came to attention that it has generally been thought that women are severelyunderrepresented in parliament and in the Conservative party (Russel et al,2000). numerous of the interviewees agreed upon the position that the woofprocess is still deemed prejudice and sexist and is still run by middle-aged men which makes it harder for females to maneuver. (Russell et al, 2000).For example, women flat only represent 9% of the parliamentary party and out of48 candidates that applied to the Conservative Part y, it was found that onlys fifty-fifty women out of those candidates were interviewed by the selection panel.This is due, as one male Conservative MP claimed, to the selection panelshaving certain bigoted views towards femalesThe selection panels are based of white sometime(a) men who consist of pig headed old guys who turn up have on Second World War underpants with the attitude that goes with it. (Male Conservative MP) This can be backed up by Theresa May, afemale member of the Conservative party, who in a party conference said expressionat its elected representatives you will see a predominantly white male party.Given that we now see an ethnically diverse society, where women play a majorrole, the conservative party doesnt look like the people its claiming torepresent. (Theresa May, Party Conference, 2002). This can be supercharge shownwhen the male MP expressed his amazement at the lack of females in parliamentand claimed that unconstipated in countries like Rwanda and Paki stan, which arenotoriously patriarchal societies, they have more(prenominal) than(prenominal) women representatives intheir government than Britain does.It has been accepted that in nine to getmore votes, the Conservative Party needs to obtain more women into the partyand thusly makes the selection process more accessible. However, one femaleconservative peer claimsIts still harder for women to get selected even inspite of the party saying wed like a womanhood. ( womanish Conservative Peer) Females were a good deal subjected to criticismfor their personal lives, if they were example said to be divorced. One femaleMP claimed that women therefore had to cuddle up to the selection committee Whose reason is to prefer a pinstripe identikitcandidate with who they wish to spend Friday evenings (Female Conservative MP)In other literature, it has been suggestedthat some women have been make to aroma uncomfortable and unwished in the Houseof Commons due to the masculine feel of it (Ru ssel et al, 2000). This isfurther shown in the data studied as a male Conservative MP talks about theaggressive nature of politics and women who feel uncomfortable in the House ofCommons are so because women are generally less confrontational than men. TheHouse of Commons is thus seen as less feminized and an unattractive place forwomen to work in. One Male MP even admitted to the party being unable to changeitself and if women werent intelligent with the way things were, then they wouldhave to adapt and change themselves in order to fit in. sexual practice Equality in the Conservative Party and House of CommonsThrough the analysis of the focus groups,the theme of equality was an issue that was raised cumulations. Interestingly, boththe men and the females agreed upon the fact thatI think for any women wanting to get aheadon her own abilities shes got to be probably twice as qualified as a lot ofmen (Focus Group, Male Conservative Member)The participants generally felt that inord er for a woman to get ahead they would have to be very self- assured andconfident if they wanted to ascertain positions they wanted. In closely of thefemale focus groups it was widely discussed that women were bullied in theHouse of Commons and that they had to draw up up with a lot of sexist rubbish,claiming that the men were always likely to back each other up, but constantlylooking for a way to swan down the women.The theme of equality is an issue that hasbeen raised in previous literature, as Dillard (2005) claimed that womenexperience some blemish based on their sex or gender roles (page number)and Krook & Childs (2010) also claimed that due to inequality, women therefore out of dately assume leadership roles and now make up a minority of all top partyofficials (Krook & Childs, 2010, 6). It was also discussed on one travelvoter focus group how politicians are out of touch with things like genderequality with one male in the group claiming that he is disappointed by thepro gress that women have made in terms of equality, and saidPoliticians often point to a rare example oftwo successful female politicians to prove that its possible, but in reality itisnt as easy as that (Male, move voter Focus Group). When asked what the Conservative Party andthe house of Commons should do to get more support of female voters and getmore women into parliament, one woman from the afloat(p) voter focus groupclaimed that even if the party did blast to appeal more to women, it wouldntmatter because the female voters would know that it was feignedInterviewer Do you think theres anything theconservative party should be doing to appeal more to women?Female Respondent If they do we know its a mouthservice. Thats the problem. They think its like we need to speak to women todo whatsoever it takes, but they shouldnt even be asking this it should be unconditioned (Female, Floating Voter Focus Group).Many of the females from the focus groupsseemed to think that the screwb all ceiling effect was still in play, with onewoman from the floating voter focus group claimingPeople are saying theres no more sexism butif you actually examine the percentage of people in the highly compensable, powerfuljobs, the glass ceiling is there and in fact its getting worse( Female, FloatingVoter Focus Group). This is further shown in the literature, inthe written report by Webb and Childs after they concluded their researchanalysis where they found that while 42% of women strongly agree thatgovernment should make sure that women have an equal chance to succeed, onlu25% of men do (Webb & Childs, 2011, 17). Showing that gender inequality isstill prevalent in some political parties. How the Conservative Party and the Houseof Commons engages with womens issues of childcare and the care of the elderly.Through analysing the data, an importanttheme present was how the Conservative Party engages with womens issues suchas childcare. It was widely discussed how politics is an inh ospitable surroundings for woman who have children and other responsibilities.The way politics works often puts off quite a lot ofwomen. Its not very friendly to somebody who has obligations to the family (MaleConservative MP). This can be seen in reports from otherliterature of meetings taking place in the House of Commons until very late atnight, subsequently making it difficult for women to be there due to familycommitments (Russel et al, 2000). Some of the female interviewees all claimedthat the unwelcoming environment made it difficult for young women to getinto politics because they are heavily burdened with the business of afull on job and looking after their children. It was discussed how woman are finding itincreasingly difficult to beguile both their careers and their personal life,with some interviewees suggesting that the reason why female candidates werentselected into the party was due to women being comprehend as unable to fullycommit to their careers like their male counterparts, one female peer claimedthereason why you end up with middle class white males is because they havepreviously run a business but women have to think about children (Female Conservative Peer). This is recognized in other literature asHymowitz (2005) argues that there has been the general acquaintance that if awoman has a child then she cant be devoted to her job as she could be. Brysonand Heppell (2010) claim that the party has been previously criticized for assumptive that women can continue with their roles at home and at work which hasput them under huge strain and they have been unable to perform to the outgo oftheir ability. They further claim that instead of having it all as liberalwomens liberation movement seemed to promise, women are instead doing it all (Bryson &Heppell, 2010, 46).Some female interviewees also complained ofbeing asked how they could cope in the party if they were to have children.Through gender norms it has been believed that the care o f the child is up tothe mother, but many of the female interviewees expressed their blow out of the water at thispolicy as one member of the Conservative Party member focus group saidwomen should be able to have the choice togo out to work or staying and rearing childrenFemaleConservative Party Member, Focus Group. In terms of how the government is concernedwith the issue of childcare, many of the female interviewees claimed that thestate isnt putting rich funding into childcare so woman are unable to juggleboth their careers and their personal life. One female of the floating voterfocus group claimedThe child care facilities in London areshocking, they are far too pricey and you need to earn 30,000 to breakevenwith childcare. (Female,Floating Voter Focus Group.)This has meant that many single mothershave had to go onto benefits, because even if they were to secure transaction,they still wouldnt be able to support themselves because of the expensive rateof childcare facilities. There was a strong agreement that childcare shouldntbe down to the responsibility of the woman, with one woman from the floatingvoter focus group claimingit shouldnt be seen as solely the womansresponsibility because two people have a child so its both their responsibilityand thats when the whole equality thing chassis of breaks down and womens issuebecome an issue. (Female,Floating Voter Focus Group.) One floating voter focus group intervieweeclaimed that womens pensions have subsequently been affected by childcare whichis an area that the government has not paid much attention to, claiming thatWomen are digging in and out of employment in a waymuch more often than men because your busy with family responsibilities (Female, Floating Voter Focus Group)As well as the responsibility of thechildren being put onto women, it is also believed that the care of the elderlyis ever part of their domain too. One female MP claimed that Anawful lot of women are tearing their hair out and tryi ng to balance everything,doing two jobs, looking after their children, their home, their elderlyrelatives. If all those women were actually working to the full extent of theircapabilities then the boost to the economy would be hearty, statisticallysignificant (Female Conservative MP). Thus meaning that due to women being underrepresented in government, there are few voices out there to friend put forwardthe issues that women are facing, such as balancing their careers with theirresponsibility to their children and other family relatives. Although it was agreed upon that therewould be many benefits of having more females in parliament and in theConservative party as one male MP claimed that woman would have a betterunderstanding of child care policies which could be put in place. The actionhas not been put in place which leaves women in a very vulnerable position, specially as there is not enough women to defend them on these grounds. closing curtainOverall this research report has demonstrated clearly that both female representation inside the ConservativeParty and the partys lack of progressive engagement with womens issues areclear demonstrations of how unrepresentative British governments make-up andenforcement currently is. The thematic analysis of Webb and Childs data hasallowed an exploration into key political issues that have arguably not beengiven due academic and political research. It has been shown to be apparentthat members of both genders within the Conservative Party acknowledge theinherent unrepresentative nature of the party and that there is little morethan plain acceptance of the cultural norms in place to main its patriarchiccontour. Given women have often come to feeluncomfortable within the Conservative party, this has transcended into femalepolitical mesh generally and leaves many holding little desire toengage with politics due to the scarce attention and impact devoted to womensissues. The supra in combination leaves the Conservative party to continue to beperceived as archaic in its views and this in turn prevents women from seeing positivistic political change or even seeking to lead such change themselves. BibliographyTranscripts usedM2 Conservative PeerM7 Conservative PeerM8 Conservative MPM9 Conservative MPW5 Conservative PeerW6 Conservative PeerW8 Conservative MPW9 Conservative MPFocus Group 1. Conservative MembersFocus Group 2 Conservative MembersFloating Voter Focus Group 1Floating Voter Focus Group 2Bryman, A. (2012)Social researchmethods. fourth edn. New York Oxford University PressBryson V & Heppell T. (2010) conservativism and womens lib The Caseof the British Conservative Party. Journal of semipolitical Ideologies. Campbell, S, Childs S & Lovenduski J.(2006) Womens Equality Guarantees andthe Conservative Party. The Political Quarterly.Childs S, Krook M. (2010).Women, Gender and Politics. A reader Oxford University Press.Childs S, Webb P. (2012). Sex, Gender and theConservative Party. From Iron L ady to Kitten Heels. Palgrave Macmillan.Chiu& Monroe (2010). Gender Equality in the Academy, the pipeline problem.Cambridge University Press.Volume 43, issue 2. Dillard, A.(2005) Adventures in Conservative Feminism Society, March/AprilForke & Rickne (2016). The GlassCeiling in Politics Formalisation and existential Tests. Comparative Politicalstudies. Hymowitz,C (2005). Women Internalize Stereotypes of Themselves as Weaker Leaders.The Wall channel Journal Online. Accessed online, 2ndMayhttp//www.careerjournal.comMay, T. (2002). Conservative PartyConference Speech. Accessed online, 4th May. https//www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/oct/07/conservatives2002.conservatives1Murray,R. (2014). Quotas for men Reframing gender quotas as a means of improving representationfor all. American Political Science Review, 108, 520-532Russel, M. Lovenduski, J, Stephenson M. (2000). Womens Political Participation in the UK. The British Council, The Constitution Unit. Accessed online, 1st May . http/ /www.ucl.ac.uk/political-science/publications/unit-publications/89.pdfSilverman,D. (2015). Interpreting QualitativeData. one-fifth Edition. Sage Publications.